Business Laws, Ethics and Communicaton

QUESTION NO. 1 :                                                                                                                                                                       
( a )    `Amit` stands surety for `Bikram` for any amount which `Chander` may lend to `Bikram` from time to time    during the next three months subject to a maximum amount of Rs. 1,00,000 ( one lakh only ). One month later `Amit` revokes the surety, when `Chander` had already lent to `Bikram` Rs. 10,000 ( ten thousand ). Referring to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Decide :                                                                                                             ( i )   Whether `Amit` is discharged from all the liabilities to `Chander` for any subsequesnt loan given to `Bikram` ?       ( ii )  What would be your answer in case `Bikram` makes a default in paying back to `Chander` the already    borrowed amount of Rs. 10,000 ?
( b )   MNO Private  Limited, a subsidiary of PQR Limited decides to give a loan of Rs. 4,00,000 to the HR ( Human Resourse ) Manager, who  is not a Key Managerial Personnel ( KMP ) of MNO Private Limited drawing salary of Rs. 30,000 per month, to buy 500 partly paid-up Equity Shares of Rs. 1000 each in MNO Private Limited. Examine the validity of company`s decision under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
( c )   State with reason whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:                                                           ( i )   Business ethics helps to promote public reputation.                                                                                                                             ( ii )  In the long run, those business entities which responds to society needs favorably will survive.
( d )   State reasons for selecting oral mode of communication instead of written mode of communication .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 1 ( a ) :                                                                                                                                                       REVOCATION OF CONTINUING GUARANTEE ( SECTION 130 AND 131 OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872.)            ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 5 MARKS ) :                                                                                                                                                 
The problem as asked in this question is based on the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as contained in Section 130 relating to revocation of a continuing guarantee as to future transactions  which can be done mainly in the following two ways :                                                                                                                                           
 1. BY  NOTICE : A continuing guarantee may, at any time , be revoked by the surety as to future transactions , by notice to the creditor.                                                                                                                                         
  2. BY DEATH OF THE SURETY :  The death of the surety operates , in the absence of any contract to the contrary, as a revocation of continuing guarantee so far as regards future transactions ( Section 131 ) .                     
  So far as the transactions  before revocation  are concerned, the liability of the surety remains.        
Thus, applying the above provisions of the said Act to the instant case:                                                                                                ( i )  Amit is discharged from all the liabilities to Chander for any subsequent loan.                                                                                             ( ii )  In the second case, the answer would differ i.e. Amit is liable to Chander for Rs. 10,000 on default of Bikram since the loan was taken before the notice of revocation was given to Chander.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 MARKS : BREAK-UP : PROVISIONS – 3 MARKS; FIRST ANSWER – 1 MARK ; SECOND ANSWER – 1 MARK. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.                                                                                                                                                                            NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION/S OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 1 ( b ) :                                                                                                                                       RESTRICTIONS ON PURCHASE BY COMPANY OR GIVING LOANS FOR PURCHASE OF ITS SHARES  ( SECTIONS 2 ( 51 ) AND 67 ( 3 ) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 5 MARKS ) :                                                                 According to Section 67 ( 3 ) of the Companies Act, 2013 a company is allowed to give a loan to its employees  subject to the following limitations :-                                                                                                                                   
 ( a )  The employee must not be a key managerial personnel ;                                                                                                             ( b )   The amount of such loan shall not exceed an amount equal to six months` salary of the employee ;                                             ( c ) The shares to be subscribed must be fully paid shares.                                                                                                   Section 2 ( 51 ) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the  “ Key Managerial Personnel “ ( KMP ) whereby a KMP includes the chief executive, company secretary, whole time director, chief financial officer or any other officer who may be prescribed.                                                                                                                                                                                          In the instant case the HR Manager is not a Key Managerial Personnel of the  MNO Private Limited. He is drawing salary of Rs. 30,000 per month and the loan taken to buy 500 partly paid up equity shares of Rs. 1000 each in MNO Private Limited.                                                                                                                                                                             Keeping in mind the above mentioned provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 the decision of the company ( MNO Private Limited ) is not valid due to two reasons :                                                                                                                                    1.  The amount of loan being more than six months` salary of the HR Manager, which should have restricted the loan     to 1.8 Lakh ;                                                                                                                                                                                                2. The shares subscribed are partly paid shares whereas the benefit is available only for subscribing fully paid shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 MARKS : BREAK-UP : PROVISIONS – 3 MARKS ; ANSWER – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.                      NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE  CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.                                                                                                                         IMPORTANT NOTE : THIS QUESTION, IN TERMS OF SECTION  67 ( 3 ) ( C ) CONTAINS SEVERAL ISSUES TO BE EXAMINED UNDER VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND HENCE TOO COMLICATED AND CRITICAL FOR THE CANDIDATES  , KEEPING IN MIND THE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE. THE QUESTION MIGHT HAVE CONFUSED THE CANDIDATES. IN VIEW OF THIS, GENERAL ANSWER  GIVEN BY THE CANDIDATES MAY BE GIVE DUE WEIGHTAGE.  NOTE : DEFINITION OF “KMP” NEED NOT BE GIVEN BY THE CANDIDATES.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 1 ( C ) ( i ) :                                                                                                                     STATEMENT ; CORRECT / INCORRECT  ( ETHICS ) ( 3 MARKS ) :                                                                                                 CORRECT : Ethics helps to promote a strong public image. An organization that pays attention to its ethics can portray a strong and positive image to the public. People see such organizations  as valuing people more than profit and striving to operate with the integrity and honour.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 MARKS : BREAK-UP : CORRECT ANSWER – 1 MARK ; REASON – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 1 ( c ) ( ii ) :                                                                                                                                  STATEMENT : CORRECT / INCORRECT ( ETHICS ) ( 2 MARKS ) :                                                                                       CORRECT :  Society  gives business its license to exist and this can be amended or revoked at any time if it fails  to live up to society`s expectations. Therefore, if a business intends to retain  its existing role and power, it must respond to society`s needs constructively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2  MARKS : BREAK-UP : CORRECT ANSWER – 1 MARK ; REASON – 1 MARK. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.             NOTE : TOTAL OF MARKS AWARDED IN PART ( c ) ( i ) AND IN PART ( c ) ( ii ) BE GIVEN AT THE END AND BE POSTED ON THE COVER PAGE OF THE ANSWER-BOOK.                                                                                                          NOTE : ANSWER GIVEN IN GENERAL MAY ALSO BE GIVEN DUE CREDIT WHILE AWARDING MARKS.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 1 ( d ) :                                                                                                                                         REASONS FOR SELECTING ORAL MODE OF COMMUNICATION ( COMMUNICATION ) ( 5 MARKS ) :                                   Oral communication is a face to face communication with others. Oral communication is characterized  by seven Cs – Candidness, Clarity, Completeness, Conciseness, Concreteness, Correctness and Courtesy. These act as principles for selecting the mode of communication. In addition to the above seven principle, oral communication has its own benefits  as under :                                                                                                                                                                      * More personal and informal;                                                                                                                                                                      * Make immediate impact ;                                                                                                                                                                * Provides opportunity for  interaction and feed back  ;                                                                                                                               * Helps us to correct ourselves ;                                                                                                                                                                 * Better for conveying  feelings and emotions ;                                                                                                                                              * More effective because one can understand the message better by observing facial expressions, eye contact, tone of voice , gestures, postures etc. of the sender.                                                                                                                                   It is said that it does not matter what you say, what matters is how you say it. Your way of saying includes your choice of words, your confidence and sincerity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE .
QUESTION NO. 2 :                                                                                                                                                                               ( a )  ( i )  State with reasons whether the following persons are entitled to receive bonus under the Payment of      Bonus Act, 1965:  ( I )   A retrenched employee.   ( II )   A dismissed employee reinstated with back wages.
        ( ii ) Mr. X was an employee of Green Sugars Ltd. The whole of undertaking of Green Sugars Ltd. was taken over by a new company named Modern Sugars Ltd. The services of Mr. X  remained continuous in the new company. After serving for one year Mr. X met with an accident and became permanently disabled. Mr. X applied to the new company for the payment of Gratuity. The new company refused to pay Gratuity on the ground that Mr. X had served only for a year in the new company.   Examine the validity of the refusal of the company in the light of the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
( b )   Explain the pragmatic reasons for maintaining ethical behavior in marketing  through marketing executives.
( c )  Write short notes on the following  : ( I ) Proxemics    ( II ) Haptics .

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO, 2 ( a ) ( i ) :                                                                                                                                  ENTITLEMENT TO BONUS ( SECTIONS 2 ( 13 ) AND SECTION 9 OF THE PAYMENT OF BONUS ACT, 1965 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                                                                                  ( I ) RETRENCHED EMPLOYEE :  A retrenched  employee  is eligible to get bonus provided that he has worked for minimum qualifying period of 30 days in the accounting year and who has drawn a salary of less than  Rs. 10,000 per month in the year. ( East Asiatic Company (P) Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal ).                                                                            ( II )  DISMISSED EMPLOYEE RE-INSTATED WITH BACK WAGES :  According to Section 9 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 an employee who is dismissed from service for fraud or riotous or violent behavior on the premises of the establishment or who is guilty of theft, misappropriation or sabotage of the property of any establishment , is disqualified from receiving bonus for the accounting year. A dismissed employee who has been reinstated with back wages is clearly not guilty of the above crimes nor has been dismissed. Hence, he is entitled to bonus. ( Gammon India Ltd. v. Niranjan Das )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : PART (I) – 2 MARKS ; PART (II) – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.                          NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT REFER TO CASE LAWS OR DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION/S OF THE PAYMENT OF BONUS ACT, 1965.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 2 ( a ) ( ii ) :                                                                                                                                ENTITLEMENT TO GRATUITY  ( SECTION – 4 OF THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS )             ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                                                                                                           According to Section 4 ( 1 ) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 gratuity shall be payable  to an employee on the termination of  his employment  after he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years on his superannuation, or on his retirement  or resignation or on his death  or disablement due to accident or disease.     The proviso to sub-section ( 1 ) of the said section states that the condition of completion of five years of continuous service is not essential in case of the termination of employment of any employee  due to death or disablement for the purpose of this section.   Disablement has been explained as such disablement  which incapacitates an employee for the work which he was capable of performing before the accident or disease resulting in such disablement.  Further, by the change of ownership , the relationship of employer and employee subsists and the new employer can not escape  from the liability of payment of gratuity to the employee; it was held in the case of Pattathurila K. Damodaran v.  M. Kassim Kanju.                                                                                                                 The given problem fulfils all the above requirements as stated. Therefore, Mr. X is entitled to recover gratuity  after becoming permanently disabled and continuous service of five years  is not required in this case. Hence, the company can not refuse to pay gratuity on the ground that he has served only for one year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4  MARKS : BREAK-UP : PROVISIONS – 3 MARKS ; ANSWER – 1 MARK. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.                    NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT REFER TO CASE LAW OR DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION OF THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972.    NOTE : TOTAL OF MARKS AWARDED IN QUESTION NO. 2 ( a ) ( i )  AND 2 ( a ) ( ii )  BE GIVEN AT THE END AND BE POSTED ON THE COVER PAGE OF THE ANSWER-BOOK.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 2 ( b ) :                                                                                                                                      PRAGMATIC REASONS FOR MAINTAINING ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR ( ETHICS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                           Marketing executives should practice ethical behavior because it is morally correct. To maintain ethical behavior  in marketing , the following positive reasons may be useful to the marketing executives :                                                                  1.  TO REVERSE DECLINING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN MARKETING :  Sometimes misleading package labels, false claim in advertisement, phony list prices, infringement of trademarks pervert the market trends and such behavior damages  the marketers` reputation. To reverse this situation, business leaders must demonstrate convincingly that they are aware of their ethical responsibility and will fulfil it. Companies must set high ethical standards and enforce them. Moreover, it is in management`s interest to be concerned with the well being of consumers, since they are the lifeblood of a business.                                                                                                                                                             2.  TO AVOID INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT REGULATION :  Business apathy, resistance or token responses to unethical behavior increase the probability of more governmental regulation. The governmental limitations may also result from management`s failure to live up to its ethical responsibilities.  Moreover, once the government control is introduced , it is rarely removed.                                                                                                                                          3.   TO RETAIN  POWER GRANTED BY SOCIETY :  marketing executives wield a great deal of social power as they influence market and speak out on economic issues. However, there is a responsibility tied to that power.  If marketers do not use their power in a socially acceptable manner, that power will be lost in the long run.                     4.  TO PROTECT THE IMAGE OF THE ORGANISATION :  Buyers often form an impression of an entire organization based on their contact with one person. That person represents  the marketing function. Sometimes a single sales clerk may pervert the market opinion in relation to that company which he represents.  Therefore, ethical behavior in marketing may be strengthened only through the behavior  of the marketing executives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.                                                                                 NOTE : BRIEF BUT CORRECT ANSWER BE GIVEN FULL CREDIT. GENERAL ANSWER GIVEN BY THE CANDIDATES BE GIVEN CREDIT WHILE AWARDING MARKS.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 2 ( c ) :                                                                                                                                                       SHORT NOTES  ( COMMUNICATION ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
( I )  PROXEMICS :  It is a form of non-verbal communication which refers to the space that  exists between  us when we talk or relate to each other  as well the way we organize space around us. We can also call it “space language” as the following four space zones indicate the type of communication and the relationship of the source and receiver : INTIMATE – Physical contact to 18 inches.                                                                                                                               PERSONAL – 18 inches to 4 feet.                                                                                                                                                     SOCIAL – 4 to 12 feet.                                                                                                                                                                     PUBLIC – 12 feet to as far as we can see or hear.
( II ) HAPTICS : It is a communication through touch. How we use touch sends important messages about us. It reveals our perceptions of status, our attitudes and even our needs. The amount of touching we do or find acceptable is atleast in part culturally conditioned.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4  MARKS : BREAK-UP : PART ( I ) – 2 MARKS ; PART ( II ) – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.
QUESTION NO. 3 :                                                                                                                                                                                           ( a ) ( i )  Under what circumstances the original contract need not be performed as stated under section 62 to 67 of      the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ?
      ( ii )  Mr. U offered to sell his house to Mr. X for Rs. 15,00,000.  Mr. X accepted the offer by post. On the very next day Mr. X sent a telegram revoking the acceptance which reached Mr. U before the later of acceptance. Is the revocation of acceptance valid ?  Would it make any difference if both the letter of acceptance and the telegram of revocation of acceptance reach Mr. U at the same time ?
( b )  ( i )  Explain any four sources of ethical standard.                                                                                                                                        ( ii )  List out the characteristics of group personality  under Group Dynamics.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 3 ( a ) ( i ) :                                                                                                                                       CONTRACTS WHICH NEED NOT BE PERFORMED ( SECTIONS 62 TO 67 OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 )            ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                                                                                 A contract would not require performance under circumstances spelt out in Sections 62 to 67  of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 62 of the said Act provides for  “novation”, “rescission” and “ alteration” and Section 63 of the said Act provides for “remission”. Thus, the  circumstances are as follows :                                                                                                                                                  ( 1 ) NOVATION :  Novation means substitution. Where a given contract is substituted by a new contract, it is novation. The old contract, on novation ceases. It need not be performed. Novation can take place with mutual consent . However, novation can take place by substitution of new contract between the same parties or between different parties. Novation results in discharge of old contract.                                                                                                                 ( 2 )  RESCISSION : In case of rescission , the old contract is cancelled  and no new contract comes in its place. A contract is also discharged by rescission. Sometimes, parties  may enter into an  agreement  to rescind the previous contract. Sometimes, the contract is rescinded  by implication or by non-performance for a long time without each other complaining about it.                                                                                                                                                            ( 3 )  ALTERATION : Where the contract is altered, the original contract is rescinded. Hence , the old one need not be performed whereas  the new one has to be performed. Alteration involves both rescission and novation. The line of difference between  alteration and novation  is very thin. While there can be very minor alterations, there can not be unilateral material alteration to a contract. If it is done , it will be void.                                                                                           ( 4 )  REMISSION : Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides for remission which means waiver. The said section  lays down that “every promisee may dispense with or remit wholly or in part, the performance of the promise made to him or extend the time for such performance or may accept instead of it any satisfaction which it thinks fit”. Thus the promisee can waive either in full or in part the obligation of the promisor or extend the time for performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4  MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.                                                                                      NOTE :  BRIEF ANSWER CORRECTLY COVERING ALL POINTS BE GIVEN FULL CREDIT.                                                                          NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATED DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 3 ( a ) ( ii ) :                                                                                                                              COMMUNICATION AND REVOCATION OF ACCEPTANCE WHEN COMPLETE (SECTIONS 4 AND 5 OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                                  The problem is related  with the communication and time of acceptance and its revocation. As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.                                                                                                                                                Whereas Section 5 of the said Act lays down that an acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.                                  Referring to the  above provisions :                                                                                                                                                            ( i )   Yes , the revocation of acceptance by Mr. X ( the acceptor ) is valid.                                                                                     ( ii )   If Mr. U opens the telegram first ( and this would be normally so  in case of a rational person ) and reads it , the acceptance stands revoked. If he opens the letter first and reads it , revocation of acceptance is not possible as the contract has already been concluded.
ALTERNATE ANSWER :                                                                                                                                                                          As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which deals with the communication of  revocation, the communication of revocation is complete as against the person who makes it , when it is put into a course of  transmission to the person  to whom it is made, so as to be put out of the power of the person who makes it. Accordingly, an acceptance is complete as against the offeror ( U ) as soon as the letter of acceptance is posted.
Revocation of acceptance given by X by telegram, a day after the letter of acceptance is posted , is not valid      against U.
With respect to the second part of the question, where both the letter of acceptance and telegram of revocation of acceptance reach Mr. U at the same time , is not appropriate since an acceptance is complete as against the offeror as soon as the letter of acceptance is posted, no question of revocation of acceptance arises.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : PROVISIONS – 2 MARKS ; ANSWER – 2 MARKS . TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER .                 NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION/S OF THE IDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872.                                                                                                                               NOTE : TOTAL OF MARKS AWARDED IN 3 ( a ) ( i ) AND IN  3 ( a ) ( ii ) BE GIVEN AT THE END AND BE POSTED ON THE COVER-PAGE OF THE ANSWER-BOOK.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 3 ( b ) ( i ) :                                                                                                                                                  FOUR SOURCES OF ETHICAL STANDARDS ( ETHICS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                  1*  THE UTILITARIAN APPROACH :  Some ethicists emphasize that the ethical action is the one that provides the most good or does the least harm, or to put it another way, produces the greatest balance of good over harm. The ethical corporate action, then, is the one that produces the greatest good  and does the least harm for all who are affected – customers, employees, shareholders, the community and the environment. The utilitarian approach deals with consequences, it tries both to increase the good done and to reduce the harm done.
2*  THE RIGHTS APPROACH ( THE DENTOLOGICAL APPROACH ) :  Other philosophers and ethicists suggest that the ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected. This approach starts from the belief that humans have a dignity based on their human nature per se on their ability to choose freely  what they do with their lives. On the basis of such dignity, they have a right to be treated as ends and not merely as means to other ends. The list of moral rights – including the rights to make one`s own choices about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth , not to be injured , to a degree of privacy and so on – is widely debated; some now argue that non-humans have rights , too. Also, it is often said that rights imply duties – in particular, the duty to respect others` rights .
3*  THE FAIRNESS OR JUSTICE APPROACH :   Aristotle and other Greek philosophers have contributed the idea that all equals should be treated equally. Today we use this idea to say that ethical actions treat all human beings equally – or if unequally, then fairly based on some standard that is defensible. We pay people more based on their harder work or the greater amount that they contribute to an organization, and say that is fair. But there is a debate over CEO salaries that are hundreds of time larger than the pay of others, many ask whether the huge disparity is based on a defensible standard or whether it is the result of an imbalance of power and hence is unfair.
4*  THE COMMON GOOD APPROACH :  The Greek philosophers have also contributed the notion that life in community is a good in itself and our action should contribute to that life. This approach suggests that the interlocking relationships of society are the basis of ethical reasoning and that respect and compassion for all others – especially the vulnerable – are requirements of such reasoning. This approach also calls attention to the common conditions that are important to the welfare of everyone. This may be a system of Laws , effective police and fire departments, health care, a public educational system, or even public recreational areas.
5*  THE VIRTUE APPROACH :  A very ancient approach  to ethics is that ethical actions ought to be consistent with certain ideal virtues that provide for the full development of our humanity. These virtues are dispositions and habits that enable us to act according to the highest potential of our character and on behalf of values like truth and beauty. Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, tolerance, love, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control and prudence are all examples of virtues. Virtue ethics asks of any action, “What kind of person will I become if I do     this ?” or “Is this action consistent with my acting at my best.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.                                                                              NOTE : THE CANDIDATES ARE REQUIRED TO STATE ANY FOUR SOURCES. GENERAL AND BRIEF ANSWER BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARDING MARKS.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 3 ( b ) ( ii ) :                                                                                                                                       CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP PERSONALITY ( COMMUNICATION ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                          Following are the characteristics of group personality :
1*  SPIRIT OF CONFORMITY : Individual members soon come to realize that in order to gain recognition, admiration and respect from others they have to achieve a spirit of conformity. Our beliefs, opinions and actions are influenced more by group opinion than by an individual`s opinion, even if it is an expert`s opinion.
2*  RESPECT FOR GROUP VALUES : Any working group is likely to maintain certain values and ideals which make it different from others. In order to deal effectively with a group we must understand its value which will guide us in foreseeing its programmes and actions.                                                                                                                                 3*  RESISTENCE TO CHANGE : It has been observed that a group generally does not take kindly to social change. On the other hand the group may bring about its own changes, whether by dictation of its leader or by consensus. The degree to which a group resists change serves as an important index of its personality. It helps us in dealing with it efficiently.
4*  GROUP PREJUDICE : Just as hardly any individual is free from prejudice, groups have their own clearly evident prejudices. It is a different matter that the individual members may not admit their prejudiced attitude to other`s race, religion, nationality etc. But the fact is that the individual`s prejudices  get further intensified while coming in contact with other members of the group holding similar prejudices.
5*  COLLECTIVE POWER :  It  need not be said that groups are always more powerful than individuals, how so ever influential the individual may be. That is why individuals may find it difficult to speak out their minds in groups. There is always the risk of the one-against-many situation cropping up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.                                                                           NOTE : THE CANDIDATES ARE REQUIRED TO STATE ANY FOUR CHARACTERSTICS. GENERAL AND BRIEF ANSWER BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARDING MARKS.                                                                                                                                       NOTE:  TOTAL OF MARKS AWARDED IN QUESTION NO. 3 ( b ) ( i ) AND 3 ( b ) ( ii )  BE GIVEN AT THE END AND BE POSTED ON THE COVER-PAGE OF THE ANSWER-BOOK.
QUESTION NO. 4 :                                                                                                                                                                       ( a ) ( i )  Explain the concept of Deemed Prospectus under the Companies Act, 2013. Under what circumstances such    prospectus need not  be issued ?
       ( ii ) Diminution of share capital does not constitute a reduction within the meaning of Companies Act, 2013.     State in what respects they differ from each other.
( b )  What is meant by ‘Critical thinking’ ? Suggest the measures to develop critical thinking.
( c )  Prepare a check list  for organizing the messages in a business firm as a job of composing business messages being assigned to you.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 4 ( a ) ( i ) :                                                                                                                                                    DEEMED PROSPECTUS ( SECTIONS 23 AND 25 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :  Under Section 25 ( 1 ) of the Companies Act, 2013any document by which an offer for sale of any securities is made to the public and the company allots or agrees to allot securities in terms thereof, then such document shall for all purposes, be deemed to be a prospectus and all enactments and rules of law as to be the contents in a prospectus and as to liability in respect of mis-statement and omissions therein shall apply and shall have effect as they apply to a prospectus.                                                                                                                                                                                        From the above provision it is quite clear that the deemed prospectus is not intended to be a document with any exceptions or concessions vis a vis a prospectus. It only broadens the scope of a prospectus to include not only the formal document issued as a prospectus but also all nature of communication made by the company with the intention of selling an issue. It is designed to prevent companies from making misleading statements through various documents, notices or circulars while keeping the formal prospectus document clean.                                                        WHEN PROSPECTUS NEED NOT BE ISSUED :                                                                                                                               Under  Section  23 of  the  Companies  Act, 2013  the  issue of  prospectus  is not  necessary  in  the  following circumstances :                                                                                                                                                                                    1.  Where a person is a bonafide invitee into an underwriting agreement with regard to any securities.                                  2.  Where securities are offered through private placement by complying with the provisions related thereto in the Companies Act, 2013.                                                                                                                                                                       3. Where securities are issued through a rights issue or a bonus issue in accordance with the applicable provisions of the said Act and in case of listed companies also in accordance with the provisions of the rules and regulations made by SEBI in this behalf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : CONCEPT – 2 MARKS ; NEED NOT BE ISSUED – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.     NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.                                                                                                                              NOTE : THE STUDY MATERIAL ( PRACTICE MANUAL , PAGE 6.58 ) PROVIDES FOR NON-ISSUING OF “PROSPECTUS” AND NO EXPRESS OR SEPARATE PROVISION IN RELATION TO “DEEMED PROSPECTUS”.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 4 ( a ) ( ii ) :                                                                                                                                DIMINITION OF SHARE CAPITAL AND REDUCTION OF SHARE CAPITAL ( SECTIONS 61,64,OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SECTIONS 101, 102 AND 103 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                               The term “diminution” denotes  a cancellation of that portion of issued capital which has not been subscribed for. Section 61 of the Companies Act, 2013 states the cancellation of “shares which at the date of passing of the resolution in that behalf have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person”.                                                              Section 61 of the Companies Act, 2013 specifically  states that the diminution does not constitute a reduction within the meaning of the Companies Act. The expression “diminution of share capital” and “reduction of share capital” differ from each other in the following respects:
( 1 )  Reduction may involve reduction inter alia of issued capital, whereas diminution may be in respect of authorized capital but not of issued capital.                                                                                                                                                ( 2 )  If the Articles provides the procedure, diminution can be effected by an ordinary resolution, while reduction ( which also need authorization by Articles ), can be effected only by special resolution.                                                                        ( 3 )  Diminution needs no confirmation by the Court ( Section 61 of the Companies Act, 2013 ), but reduction needs such confirmation ( Section 101 of the Companies Act, 1956 ).                                                                                                       ( 4 )  Where a company is ordered to add to its name the words “and reduced” these words shall , until the expiry of the period specified in the order, be deemed to be part of the company`s name ( Section 102(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 ) but such a provision does not exist in the case of diminution of the share capital as envisaged in Section 61 of the Act of 2013.                                                                                                                                                                             ( 5 )  In the case of diminution, notice is to be given to the Registrar within 30 days from the date of cancellation whereupon the Registrar shall record the notice and make the necessary alteration in the Memorandum or Articles or both ( Section 64 of the Companies Act, 2013 ), whereas in the case of reduction more detailed procedure regarding notice to the Registrar has been prescribed by Section 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, though there is no such time limit as aforesaid ( i.e.30 days ).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.                                                                                         NOTE : ANY FOUR POINTS OF DIFFERENCE BE TREATED AS COMPLETE ANSWER.                                                                                  NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVENT SECTIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 OR THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.                                                                           NOTE : TOTAL OF MARKS AWARDED IN QUESTION NO. 4 (a) (i) AND 4 (a) (ii) BE GIVEN AT THE END AND BE POSTED ON THE COVER PAGE OF THE ANSWER-BOOK.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 4 ( b ) :                                                                                                                                                       CRITICAL THINKING  ( COMMUNICATION )( 4 MARKS ) :                                                                                                                                                    Critical thinking is the is the discipline of rigorously and skillfully using information, experience, observation and reasoning to guide one`s decision, actions and beliefs. Critical thinking refers to the act of question of every step of the thinking process e.g.  Have you considered all the facts ? Have you tested your assumptions ?  Is your reasoning sound ? Can you be sure that your judgment is unbiased ?  Is your thinking process logical, rational and complete ?
DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING :   To develop as a critical thinker, one must be motivated to develop the following attributes :                                                                                                                                                                            1.  OPEN MIND : Readiness to accept and explore alternative approaches and ideas.                                                                2. WELL INFORMED : Knowledge of the facts and what is happening on all fronts.                                                                       3. EXPERIMENTAL : Thinking through what if scenario to create probable options and then test  the theories to determine what will work and what will not be acceptable.                                                                                                           4. CONTEXTUAL :  Keeping in mind the appropriate context in the course of analysis. Apply factors of analysis  that  are  relevant or appropriate.                                                                                                                                                          5.  RESERVED IN MAKING CONCLUSION : Knowledge of when a conclusion is a fact and when it is not only true conclusions supporting decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : MEANING – 2 MARKS ; MEASURES TO DEVELOP – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER. NOTE : CANDIDATES REQUIRED TO STATE ANY TWO MEASURES TO DEVELOP CRITICAL THINKING.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 4 ( c ) :                                                                                                                                                     CHECK-LIST FOR ORGANISING THE MESSAGE ( COMMUNICATION ) ( 4 MARKS ):
1.     RECOGNISE GOOD ORGANISATION :  ( a ) Subject and purpose are clear.  ( b ) Information is directly related to subject and purpose. ( c )  Ideas are grouped and presented logically. ( d )  All necessary information is included.
2.     ACHIEVE GOOD ORGANIZATION THROUGH OUTLINING :  ( a ) Decide what to say – i. Main idea , ii. Major points,  iii. Evidence.  ( b )  Organize the message to respond the audience is probable reaction – i. use the direct approach when audience will be neutral pleased, interested or eager.  ii.  Use the indecent approach when audience will be displeased, interested or unwilling.
3.     CHOOSE THE APPROPRIATE ORGANIZATION PLAN :  ( a ) Short messages -  i. Direct request,  ii. Routine, good news and good message,  iii. Bad news message,  iv.  Persuasive message.  ( b ) Longer message -  i. Information pattern,   ii. Analytical pattern.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.                                                                                NOTE : BRIEF AND GENERAL ANSWER BE CONSIDERED WHILE AWARDING MARKS.

QUESTION NO. 5 :                                                                                                                                                                                      ( a )   ( i )  Mr. A is the payee of an order cheque. Mr. B steals the cheque and forges Mr. a signatures and endorses the cheque in his own favour. Mr. B then further endorses the cheque to Mr. C, who takes the cheque in good faith and for valuable consideration. Examine the validity of the cheque as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and also state whether Mr. C can claim the privileges of a holder-in-Due course?
         ( ii )  Explain the concept and different forms of Restrictive and Qualified endorsement.
( b )   Examine the validity of the following referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and /or Rules:
         “The Articles of Association of X Ltd. contained provision that up to 4% of issue price of the shares may be                      
            paid as underwriting commission to the underwriters. The Board of Directors of X Ltd. decided to pay 5%  
           underwriting commission.”
( c )    Discuss different environmental phenomena of ethical concern ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 5 ( a ) ( i ) :                                                                                                                                              TITLE TO FORGED CHEQUE (THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :                            Forgery confers no title and a holder acquires no title  to a forged instrument. A forged document is a nullity. The property in the  instrument remains vested in the person who is the holder at the time when the forged signature were put on it. Forgery is also not capable of being ratified. In case of forged endorsement , the person claiming under forged endorsement even if he is purchaser for value and in good faith, can not acquire the rights of a holder in due course. Therefore, Mr. C  acquires no title on the cheque . ( Mercantile Bank v. D`Silva ). Such holder is not a holder in due course and hence no privilege  is available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.  NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT CASE LAW.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 5 ( a ) ( ii ) :                                                                                                                                    RESTRICTIVE / QUALIFIED ENDORSEMENT ( THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 ( BUSINESS LAWS )                ( 4  MARKS ) :                                                                                                                                                                                       1. RESTRICTIVE ENDORSEMENT :  Such an endorsement  has the effect of restricting further negotiation and transfer       of the instrument.
    Example :  ( 1 )  Pay to A only                          S. Mukerjee
                      ( 2 )  For the account of A only      N. Aiyar
2. CONDITIONAL OR QUALIFIED ENDORSEMENT : Such an endorsement combines an order to  pay with condition.
       Example:  Pay to A on safe receipt of goods.           V. Chopra
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : 2 MARKS FOR EACH FORM OF ENDORSEMENT. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.                          NOTE : TOTAL OF MARKS AWARDED IN QUESTION NO. 5 (a) (i) AND ( a ) ( ii )  BE GIVEN AT THE END AND BE POSTED ON THE COVER PAGE OF THE ANSWER-BOOK.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 5 ( b ) :
UNDERWRITING COMMISSION ( THE COMPANIES ( PROSPECTUS AND ALLOTMENT OF SECURITIES ) RULES, 2014 )  ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
Under the Companies ( Prospectus and Allotment of Securities ) Rules, 2014 the rate of commission paid or agreed to be paid shall not exceed, in case of shares , five percent  ( 5 % ) of the price at which the shares are issued or at a rate authorized by Articles, whichever is less.
In the given problem, the Articles of X Ltd. have prescribed 4 % underwriting commission but the directors decided to pay 5 % underwriting commission.
Therefore, the decision of the Board of Directors  to pay 5 % commission to the underwriters is invalid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE .

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 5 ( c ) :  
ENVIRONMENTAL PHENOMENA OF ETHICAL CONCERN ( ETHICS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
An ecological system is an interrelated and interdependent set of organism and environments, such as a lake, in which a fish depend on small aquatic organism, which in turn live off decaying plant and fish waste products. Since the various parts of an ecological system are interrelated, the activities of one of its parts will affect all the other parts. Business firms ( and all other social institutions ) are parts of a larger ecological system. Business firms depend on the natural environment for their energy, material resources and waste disposal , and that environment in turn is affected by the commercial activities of business firms.
The issue of environmental ethics goes beyond the problems relating to protection of environment or nature in terms of pollution, resource utilization or waste disposal. It is the issues of explosive human nature and attitudes that should be addressed in a rational way. Problems like Global warming, Ozone depletion and disposal of hazardous wastes that concern the entire world. They require International cooperation and have to be tackled at the global level.
Few decades ago, the corporate world , the industry or others engaged in the use of natural resources or environmental services were mainly concerned with good business in economic sense. There is now a growing concern for social responsibility and ethical norms in all spheres of human activities; be it public behavior, business or environment and there are ethical concerns to look after not only the interest of stakeholders but also that of community ; as the regulatory / mandatory requirements have have also become more stringent. This translates into providing safety for the workers at work place, concern for their health, reducing pollution and incorporating environmental values in governance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.
NOTE  : GENERAL AND BRIEF ANSWER BE CONSIDERED WHILE AWARDING MARKS.

QUESTION NO. 6 :
( a )   What is the importance of registered office of a company ? State the procedure for shifting of  a registered office of the company from one state to another state under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
( b )   Draft a notice for convening the Board of Directors Meeting of M/s Growmore Limited where the agenda is to consider buy-back of company`s equity share capital to an extent of 5 % of its issued share capital and also where Mr. Anand is to be co-opted as an additional director.
( c )   State whether the following statements are correct or incorrect :
       ( i )    A limited company can become a partner in a partnership firm.
      ( ii )   A special resolution is one, to pass, requires the votes cast in favour be twice the votes cast against it.
     ( iii )  A cheque marked “Not negotiable” is not transferable.
     ( iv ) A promissory note duly executed in favour of a minor , is valid.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 6 ( a ) :
IMPORTANCE AND SHIFTING OF REGISTERED OFFICE OF A COMPANY ( SECTIONS 11, 12 AND 13 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 8 MARKS ) :
IMPORTANCE OF REGISTERED OFFICE : 
The importance of the registered office of a company is clearly established in two sections of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 11 ( 1 ) ( b ) states that a company having share capital shall not commence business unless it has filed with the Registrar a verification of its registered office as required by Section 12 ( 2 ) which requires every company to furnish to the Registrar a verification of its registered office within a period of 30 days of its incorporation in such manner as may be prescribed.
Further, Section 12 ( 1 ) states that a company shall, on and from the fifteenth day of its incorporation and every time thereafter, having a registered office capable of receiving and acknowledging all communications and notices addressed to it.
Section 12 ( 3 ) of the said Act further requires every company to
·         Paint or affix its name and address of its registered office, and keep the same painted and affixed, on the out side of every office or place in which its business is carried on. Such display must be in a conspicuous position, in legible letters in characters and letters of the local language ( if chosen by the company ) ;
·         Get its name, address of its registered office and the corporate identity number and other details, on all its business letters , bill heads, notices and other publications.
From the above provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the extremely  high importance of  the registered office of a company can be well understood as it serves as the location where  : ( a ) necessary documents may be served upon or deposited; ( b )  notices, letters etc. may be issued, ( c )  inspection may be done and ( d ) communication may be made. The domicile and the nationality of the company is determined by the place of its registered office. This is also important for determining the jurisdiction of the Court governing it.
Notice of the situation of the registered office and of every change therein must be sent to the Registrar ( otherwise than through statement as to the address of the registered office in the annual report ) within 30 days of the date of incorporation and the date of change. This provision is designed to locate the spot where the records of the company could be inspected and where the letters should be addressed and notices served upon the company.
PROCEDURE OF SHIFTING THE REGISTERED OFFICE  :
 In order to shift the registered office from one state to another the following procedure will have to be followed:
1.     Hold a Board Meeting for the purpose of calling a general meeting of the members of the companyin which the shifting of the registered office from one state to another will have to be approved.
2.     The general meeting of the members will have to pass a special resolution approving the ahange of address of the registered office from one state to another as required by Section 13 ( 1 ) of the  Companies Act, 2013.
3.     Make an application toe the Central Government in such form and manner as may be prescribed, for getting its approval under Section 13 ( 4 ) of the said Act.
4.     Under Section 13 ( 7 ) of the Companies Act, 2013 where an alteration of the Memorandum results in the transfer of the registered office of the company from one state to another, a certified copy of the order of the Central Government approving the alteration shall be filed by the company with the Registrar of each of the states, within such time and such manner as may be prescribed, and the Registrar shall register the same. The Registrar of the state where the registered office is being shifted to , shall issue a fresh certificate of incorporation indicating the alteration.
5.     The change in name will be effective only after the issue of the fresh certificate of incorporation by the Registrar of the state where the registered office is being shifted to.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8 MARKS : BREAK-UP : IMPORTANCE – 4 MARKS ; PROCEDURE OF SHIFTING – 4 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.
NOTE : A BRIEF ANSWER COVERING BASIC POINTS BE GIVEN FULL CREDIT.
NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 6 ( b ) :
NOTICE OF MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS ( COMMUNICATION ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
Notice is hereby given that meeting of the Board of Directors of M/s Growmore Limited will be held at the registered office on ………………at ………….a.m. /p.m.  to transact the following :
AGENDA :
1.     Confirmation of the minutes of the previous Board Meeting held on …………. To …………….  .
2.     Discussion of the progress in business.
3.     Co-option of Mr. Anand as Additional Director of the company
4.     Buy back of 5 % of the equity shares of the company.
5.     Any other matter with the permission of the chair.

Place ………………………….
Date …………………………..                                                                                   By Order of the Board of Directors
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.
NOTE : GENERAL DRAFTING OF THE NOTICE MAY BE CONSIDERED WHILE AWARDING MARKS.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 6 ( c ) :
STATEMENTS : CORRECT OR INCORRECT  ( THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 / THE NEGITIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT,       1881 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
( i )   CORRECT. ( A limited company can become a partner in the partnership firm )
( ii )  INCORRECT. ( A special resolution is one, to pass, requires the votes cast in favour be twice the votes cast    against it )
( iii ) INCORRECT. ( A cheque marked “ Not negotiable “ is not transferable )
( iv ) CORRECT. ( A promissory note duly executed in favour of a minor is valid )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : 1 MARK EACH FOR CORRECT ANSWER.
NOTE : THE LANGUAGE OF THE QUESTION IS VERY CLEAR. THE CANDIDATES ARE REQUIRED TO STATE WHETHER THE STATEMENT IS CORRECT OR INCORRECT. GIVING REASONS IS NOT REQUIRED. HENCE, MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT GIVE REASON.

QUESTION NO. 7 :
ANSWER ANY FOUR OF THE FOLLOWING :
( a )  State the provisions of the Employees` Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952  regulating the quantum of contribution to be made by the employer and the employee in the Provident Fund. Is it possible for an employee to increase the amount of his contribution to the Provident Fund more than the minimum contribution as statutorily prescribed ?
( b )  A company refuses to register transfer of shares made by Mr. X  to Mr. Y. The company does not even send a notice of refusal to Mr. X or Mr. Y respectively within the prescribed period. Has the aggrieved part any right(s) against the company for such refusal ? Advise as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
( c )  When is an allotment of shares treated as an irregular allotment ? Briefly state the effects of an irregular allotment.
( d )  Explain the practices  widely recognized as discriminatory in employment.
( e )  What are the basic principles of inter-personal communication ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 7 ( a ) :
( CONTRIBUTION TO PROVIDENT FUND ) ( SECTION 6 OF THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
Section 6 of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 regulates contribution to Provident Fund Scheme established under the Act.
The employer`s contribution shall be 10 % of the basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance , if any payable to each of the employee whether employed by him directly or by through a contractor.
The employee`s contribution shall be equal to the contribution payable by the employer in respect of him.
In case the employee so desires , he may contribute an amount exceeding ten percent of his basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance if any, subject to the condition that the employer shall not be under an obligation to pay any contribution over and above his contribution payable under this section.
Dearness allowance includes cash value of any food concession allowed to the employees. Retaining allowance means the sum paid for retaining the service , when the factory is not working.
The Central Government may by notification make the employer`s contribution equal to 12 % for certain establishments or class of establishments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.
NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION OF THE RELEVANT ACT.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 7 ( b ) :
REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF TRANSFER OF SECURITIES : REMEDIES AGAINST (  SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 )  ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
The problem as asked in the question is governed by Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 dealing with the refusal to  register transfer of securities and appeal against such refusal.
In the present case the company has committed a wrongful act of not sending the notice of refusal of registering the transfer of shares.
Under Section 58 ( 3 ) , if a public company, without sufficient cause refuses to register the transfer of securities within a period of thirty days from the date on which the instrument of transfer is delivered to the company, the transferee may, within a period of sixty days of such refusal or where no intimation has been received from the company, within  ninety  days of  the delivery  of the  instrument  of transfer  of transfer ,  appeal to  the Tribunal     ( CLB ).
Section 58 ( 4 ) of the said Act further provides that the Tribunal ( CLB ) , while dealing with an appeal made under sub-section ( 3 ), may, after hearing the parties , either dismiss the appeal , or by order –
( a )  direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and the company shall comply with such order within a period of ten days of the receipt of the order, or
( b )  direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay damages , if any, sustained by any party aggrieved.
Thus, in the instant case Mr. X can appeal to the Tribunal ( CLB ) and claim damages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : PROVISIONS – 3 MARKS ; ANSWER – 1 MARK. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.
NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 7 ( c ) :
IRREGULAR  ALLOTMENT /  EFFECT OF ( SECTIONS 23, 26, 39 AND 40 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ) ( BUSINESS LAWS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
IRREGULAR ALLOTMENT :
The Companies Act, 2013 does not separately provide for the term ‘Irregular Allotment” of securities. Hence, one will have to examine the requirements of a proper issue of securities and consider the consequences of non-fulfilment of those requirements.
In broad terms, an allotment of shares is deemed to be irregular when it has been made by a company in violation of Sections 23, 26, 39 and 40 of the Companies Act, 2013. Irregular allotment, therefore, arises in the  following instances :
1.     Where a company does not issue a prospectus in a public issue as required by Section 23; or
2.     Where the prospectus issued by the company does not include any of the matters required to be included therein under Section 26 ( 1 ), or information given is misleading, faulty and incorrect; or
3.     Where the prospectus has not been filed with the Registrar for registration under Section 26 ( 4 ); or
4.     The minimum subscription as specified in the prospectus has not been received  in terms of Section 39; or
5.     The minimum amount receivable on application is less than 5 % of the nominal value of the securities offered offered or lower than the amount prescribed by SEBI in this behalf ; or
6.     In case of a public issue, approval for listing has not been obtained from one or more of the recognized stock exchanges under Section 40 of the Companies Act, 2013.
EFFECTS OF IRREGULAR ALLOTMENT :
The consequences of an irregular allotment depend on the nature of irregularity. However, the Companies Act, 2013 does not mention ( unlike the previous Companies Act ) that in case of irregular allotment the contract is voidable at the option of the allottee.
Under Section 26 ( 9 ) of the Companies Act, 2013 if a prospectus is issued in contravention of the provisions of Section 26, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to three lakh rupees and every person who is knowingly a party to the issue of such prospectus shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to  three lakh rupees , or with both.
Similarly, in case the company has not received  the minimum subscription amount within 30 days of the date of issue of the prospectus, it must refund the application money received by it within the stipulated time. Any allotment made in violation of this will be void and the defaulting company and officers will be liable to further punishment as provided in Section 39 ( 5 ) of the said Act.
Under Section 40 ( 5 ) of the said Act any default made in respect of getting the approval to listing of securities in one or more recognized stock exchange in case of a public issue, will render the company punishable with a fine which shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may extend to fifty lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year  or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to three lakh rupees , or with both.
Thus, under various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 stringent punishment has been  provided for against irregular allotment of securities but the option of going ahead with such allotment even if desires by the allottee is not specifically permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS : BREAK-UP : IRREGULAR ALLOTMENT – 2 MARKS ; EFFECTS – 2 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED TOGETHER.
NOTE : MARKS NOT TO BE DEDUCTED ON THE GROUND THAT THE CANDIDATE DID NOT CITE THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.                                                                                                                                          NOTE : BRIEF ANSWER COVERING THE BASIC POINTS BE GIVEN FULL CREDIT OF MARKS.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 7 ( d ) :
DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES IN EMPLOYMENT ( ETHICS ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
Discrimination in employment is wrong because it violates the basic principle of justice by differentiating  between people on the basis of characteristics ( race or sex ) that are not relevant to the tasks they must perform.
It is consequently understandable that the law has gradually  been changed to conform to these moral requirements, and that there has been a growing recognition of the various ways in which discrimination in employment occurs. Among the practices now widely recognized as discriminatory are the following :
*RERUITMENT PRACTICE :
Firms that rely solely on the world-of –mouth referrals of present employees to recruit new workers tend to recruit only from those racial and sexual groups that are already represented in their labor force. Also, when desirable job positions  are only advertised in media that are not used by minorities or are classified as for men only, recruitment would also tend to be discriminatory.
*SCREENING PRACTICES :
Job qualifications are discriminatory when they are not relevant to the job to be performed ( e.g. requiring a high school diploma or a credential for an essentially manual task ). Job interviews are discriminatory if the interviewer routinely disqualifies certain class of people – for example, assumptions about occupations “suitable for women” or the propriety of putting women in “ male “ environments.
*PROMOTION PRACTICES:
Promotion, job progression and transfer practices are discriminatory when employers place males on job tracks separate from those open to women and minorities. When promotions rely on the subjective recommendations of immediate supervisors.
*CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT :
Many times wages and salaries are discriminatory to the extent that equal wages and salaries are not given to people  who are doing essentially the same work. Another issue is related to fair wages and treatment to workers. Companies  subcontracting manufacturing  operations abroad are now aware of the ethical issues associated with supporting facilities like child labour that abuse and / or underpay their work force. Such facilities have been termed “sweatshops”.
*DISMISSAL :
Firing an employee on the basis of his or her race or sex is a clear form of discrimination. Less blatant but still discriminatory are layoff policies that rely on a seniority system, in which women and minorities have the lowest seniority because of past discrimination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS . TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.
NOTE : ANY FOUR POINTS WRITTEN BY THE CANDIDATE BE GIVEN FULL CREDIT.
NOTE : A BRIEF AND GENERAL ANSWER BE CONSIDERED  WHILE AWARDING MARKS.

ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 7 ( e ) :
PRINCIPLE OF INTER-PERSONAL COMMUNICATION ( COMMUNICATION ) ( 4 MARKS ) :
The following principles are key to interpersonal communication :-
*INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION IS INESCAPABLE :
We can not keep ourselves away from communication. The very attempt not to communicate , communicates something. Not only through words but also through the tone of voice and gestures, postures, facial expressions etc. we constantly communicate to others.
*INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION IS IRREVERSIBLE :
It is rightly said that a word uttered once can not be taken back.                                                                                 *INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION IS COMPLICATED :
No form of communication is simple due to the number of variables involved; even simle request can be extremely complex.
*INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION IS CONTEXTUAL :
Communication does not take place in isolation.  They are context specific.
 *PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTEXT :
It refers to who the communicators are and what they bring to the interaction ? Their needs, desires, values, personality etc. all form the psychological context.
*RELATIONAL CONTEXT :
This is concerning the nature of interaction and reactions and the way it all affects the communication process.
*SITUATIONAL CONTEXT :
Refers to social concept of communication viz. an interaction that takes place in a classroom will be very different from one that takes place in a board room.
*ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT :
It is all about the surroundings in which communication takes place e.g. furniture location, noise level, temperature, season, time of day etc. are all examples of elements in the environmental context.
*CULTURAL CONTEXT :
Includes  all the learned  behaviours and rules that affect the interaction. If one comes from a culture where it is considered rude to establish long, direct eye contact, one will out of politeness avoid eye contact. If the other person comes from a culture where long direct eye contact signals trustworthiness, then we have a basis for misunderstanding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 MARKS. TO BE AWARDED ON THE BASIS OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE.
NOTE : ANY FOUR POINTS CORRECTLY WRITTEN BY THE CANDIDATES BE GIVEN FULL CREDIT.
NOTE : GENERAL AND BRIEF ANSWER GIVEN BY THE CANDIDATE BE CONSIDERED WHILE AWARDING MARKS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------